![]() I think Kodak Kodachrome is still my favorite solution for a drab image. I have to admit I found myself opening an image in Exposure X2 to find a solution for an image that was not going my way. I have seen some amazing results by artists and photographers who specialize in this area. Only recently have I began to appreciate the movement towards replicating analog film. The retro-analog presets are the selling points for Exposure X2. I was able to import my Nikon NEF files and make changes as I would expect from Adobe Bridge, but with the inclusion of the various presets and analog film settings, I feel like this might be a viable if not a creative alternative. ![]() It lacks the catalog management of Lightroom, but making adjustments to multiple images is as simple as selecting several images at a time.Īs far as Raw files, Exposure makes for an interesting bridge program and camera firmware simulator. ![]() After opening a collection of images, I couldn’t help but make comparisons to Adobe Lightroom. Photoshop has had the benefit of decades to create the accepted icons for its editing tools, whereas Exposure X2 has to be straightforward with labels.įinding the file manager takes a second. On a large Mac with a 27 inch screen, this is less of an issue. On smaller screens it crowds out the image with oversized menus and file management strips. One of the downsides of Exposure X2 is the small editing window. A bit of hunting around and workflow begins to get the rhythm. A new photographer might find the interface perplexing. Starting Exposure X2 from Launch Pad or from Photoshop, the interface is both familiar but still cluttered.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |